Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:00
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
America’s Small Businesses Hopeful of Boost From Trump’s Spending Bill - WSJ
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
'Mission: Impossible 8': Inside How They Shot Underwater Submarine - IndieWire
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
If you caught a shoplifter at your yard sale, how would you handle it?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the difference in doing a hot rail and just smoking a bowl?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What is the degree of influence of Saudi Wahhabism on the modern Muslim world?
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why didn’t Obito confront Kakashi after he witnessed him kill Rin?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.